Another Doctor Against Tort Reform

side note: Most doctors in the United States support tort reforms that would make it more difficult to sue for medical malpractice, arguing that this would decrease the cost of healthcare. This doctor’s essay makes the opposite claim. When you start thinking of how much money is spent on malpractice insurance for doctors, $22 billion, compared to the overall expenditures spent on healthcare ($2.6 trillion), you start to see why the med-mal industry shouldn’t be the first part to overhaul.

Today’s Salon features an essay from Rahul K. Parikh, M.D. on how restricting the legal rights of injured patients won’t lower costs or improve health care. Dr. Parikh – instead of resorting to the empty rhetoric and dubious statistics of tort reform groups – examines the actual data and academic research that’s out there.

He finds no evidence of an epidemic of malpractice suits, and that it’s not a cost-driver either.

see original

You may also like

Legislative panel approves medical malpractice bill
Read more
Urgent-care centers: Illinois numbers grow as time-pressed families seek low-cost option to ERs
Read more
Global Center for Medical Innovation launches
Read more

Recent Posts

Malpractice Insurance 101: Reputation Protection

5 Common Liability Coverage Discounts for Physicians

How Louisiana’s COVID Immunity Ruling Impacts Healthcare Providers and Medical Liability Cases

North Carolina Supreme Court Removes Precedent Shielding Nurses from Medical Liability Claims

Popular Posts

Malpractice Insurance 101: Reputation Protection

PIAA 2017: Current Trends & Future Concerns

How Louisiana’s COVID Immunity Ruling Impacts Healthcare Providers and Medical Liability Cases

North Carolina Supreme Court Removes Precedent Shielding Nurses from Medical Liability Claims

Start Your Custom Quote Process™

Request a free quote